I am down to two handguns that are not expressly intended for defensive carry. Age and infirmity have made the others less than useful for me.
Things were not always that way. Target revolvers, a great SAA, an 1851 replica, and other favorites were regularly taken to the range on weekends, where I joined with friends who brought Lugers, Tokarevs, Gold Cups, various Colt and Smith revolvers off different frame sizes,, the occasional Beretta 1934 or PPk, and so on, for some shooting fun.
Those were the days, but for me, that is all in the past.
From the time I was ten until I was well over thirty, I read gun books and magazines all the time. Technology has changed that. Now, I can get as much enjoyment from the web, and from posts from CraigC and Driftwood Johnson, as I ever did from
Shooting Times or
Sixguns by Keith.
Now, if I had a backyard range, I could shoot more. My semi-auto CCW pistol would get more use, but I would not consider that to be recreation.
So, what might I want to shoot? A new Python, a Schofield. or a Pedersoli black powder target pistol?
Well, yes, all of those, but thinking about it, it would take a lot less typing to approach it from the other direction.
Here, I think, are the handguns I would
not want:
- Anything with a spur trigger--too dangerous to handle
- Any pin-fire gun--neat, but the ammunition is too dangerous to handle
- One of those little single action NAA .22 revolvers--toys, lethal, and very possible to misuse
- A .25 ACP vest pocket pistol--I've fired them, and they don't do anything for me
- A pepperbox replica--why?
- Derringers--I just don't like 'em
- Them real big guns that I cannot handle
Edited to add:
- A large rifled revolver chambered for shot-shells
- A target air pisol that must be pumped ten times between shots
That's how see it. Others may see it differently.
Some decades ago, I divested a Colt SAA .45 , because I did not want anyone loading six into it.
CraigC has changed my thoughts on that.
How do others feel?