I want a .38 wadcutter semi auto

Status
Not open for further replies.

jerkface11

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
5,502
Location
Arkansas
I really want a semi auto chambered for .38 wadcutter. There are 2 currently on gunbroker a smith and a colt both are $1400 bucks. Is there a less expensive alternative?
 
I've been surprised at how much asking prices have gone up for the S&W 52.
Yeah I was shocked that it was that expensive. Of course it had 0 bids. Maybe someone will have a reasonable one at the tulsa gunshow. If not I may have to get one built for me.
 
um do you mean .38 special or super? Its hard to find an auto that feeds wadcutters.

I mean .38 special wadcutter. There are 1911's and S&W's out there. I also saw a Beretta in a gun magazine a long time ago I don't know if it was a production gun though.
 
ljnowell said:
um do you mean .38 special or super? Its hard to find an auto that feeds wadcutters.
He means .38 Special wadcutter, all right. ;)

These were somewhat specialized target shooting pistols that were intended to combine .38 wadcutter accuracy with an autoloading action. TheSmith & Wesson Model 52 turns up with some frequency at the local big gun shows. It is all steel with a five-inch barrel, single-action (not double) trigger and a five-round magazine. I've never personally seen a factory Colt in this cartridge.
 
Colt isn't the only one but the others are MORE expensive. I found an STI on another site but it was 2 grand. For that price it better load its own mags.
 
S&w 52

S&W 52 is an extremely accurate pistol with a very good set of sights and a superb trigger. Only drawback for some shooters is that they only have a 5-shot clip. IMO they're worth the price.
 
I placed a bid on one we'll see what happens. If I can't turn one up I'll see about getting a local smith to build me one.
 
In bullseye competition the shooter is allowed to load only five rounds in the magazine so there is no need for the magazine to hold more.

I've owned both the S&W 52 and 1911's chambered for the .38 WC. They were used in the centerfire match in bullseye 900 matches. But only by new shooters who didn't know any better. Neither gun could be counted on to get through a match without a malfunction or two. Seasoned shooters soon learned to use their .45 in both the .45 and the centerfire matches.

Loading a wadcutter round into a chamber is little different from loading an empty case. It is difficult to get them to feed reliably. And the difficulty is compounded by having a rim on the case which prevents the cartridges from stacking flat in the magazine.

I don't know why you want a wadcutter pistol. They are no more accurate than a properly tuned .45 and much less dependable. But obviously you have your reasons so I will wish you the best of luck with your auction.
 
x2 on owlhoot's post.

I bought a Smith M52 in Norman, OK for $295. because the owner of the local hardware store said none of his customers had any use for it. At the time I doubt one could have been had in Calif. for under $600. I was in that town for a training seminar thing, had it shipped home and took it to a match soon after I got home. I quickly learned to hate that gun. First thing was that it ejected my precious brass a half a block. Then it couldn't go more than 30 rounds without an alibi needing at least a feedramp swabbing.

I was able to sell it to another member of the bullseye club I was in for $500. though, so it turned out to be my best gun deal to date. That was 1977.
 
The S&W 52 is known to break barrel bushings, and you can't get them, or any other parts from S&W anymore.

rcmodel
 
I've owned both the S&W 52 and 1911's chambered for the .38 WC. They were used in the centerfire match in bullseye 900 matches. But only by new shooters who didn't know any better. Neither gun could be counted on to get through a match without a malfunction or two. Seasoned shooters soon learned to use their .45 in both the .45 and the centerfire matches.
I've got a Giles .38 Special M1911 built on a Colt .38 Super. I'm NOT a "new shooter" and wasn't one when I bought it. That is BAR NONE the most accurate centerfire auto I've ever shot, much less owned. It's also superbly reliable.

I've won my class in 2700s that I NEVER would have had I used the .45 for the centerfire. I wouldn't even DREAM of shooting the centerfire with a .45 now that I have that Giles.
 
The S&W 52 is known to break barrel bushings, and you can't get them, or any other parts from S&W anymore.
Actually, the most common part to break on 52s is the extractor. Pre-52-2 guns are notorious for breaking extractors which are very hard to come by. 52-2s aren't nearly as bad.

I'll stick with my Giles M1911.
 
I have a 52-2 with a 6" Bar-Sto maganaported (is that a word?) barrel. It also has the adjustable counter weight and adjustable target grips. It has NEVER jammed even with my own miserable cast bullet reloads and "found brass".
It is silly accurate if I haven't been drinking.
I bought it over 20 years ago and the only grief it has ever given me is buying magazines for it. The only ones that work correctly are ORIGINAL S&W mags. There were some reproductions made that routinely won't hold the slide back after the last shot. No matter what...the mags go for over $50.00 each. There was gunsmith in PA some years ago that converted the mags from 5 rounds to 6 and the general opinion was that they worked wonderfully but by the time I tracked him down he had passed away.
Anyway, till you've seen an automatic digest a 38 WC PERFECTLY every time...you just can't believe it.
 
My S&W 52-1 has never failed me in any way whatsoever. It eats my reloads like candy and is the most accurate and most enjoyable pistol I've ever shot. I bought it like new for $825 a year ago online.
An absolute shooting machine!
And beautiful to boot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top